Post by bisal37 on Mar 10, 2024 8:22:08 GMT
judges Point! There is no compromise on this. But, Edi Rama came out today and called the finding of the collapse in justice as a letter against veting. Ulerite banality. There is no fault, the situation of the justice system is so difficult and complex that it cannot be explained to him with WhatsApp or a memo no longer than three paragraphs. But his rural populist Leifenism does not stop here. Rama has taken it upon himself to create the New Man in Justice. He put Taulant Ballen and Ulsi Manjen in a monument of rural constitutionalism, to propose that those who do not pass the vetting do not have the right to obtain a lawyer's license and to make a living with their profession.
According to this militant ruralism, a judge USA Phone Number who did not pass the vetting because a relative was sentenced for 0.4 grams of hashish for personal use, cannot become a lawyer. If a judge who was dismissed because she did not justify her property was left by her husband before she met him and married him, she cannot become a lawyer. According to this rule, these people aged 40-60 must either go back to university for another 5 years and study another profession or sell bananas. That Rama considers "ethical integrity" very important. Precisely the one who screamed about removing the mandate of the deputy or the mayor from a person convicted of rape, murder, drug trafficking, prostitution or kidnapping, was a violation of constitutional rights.
This is a serious violation of the constitutional right of Article 49 of the Constitution, which gives every citizen the right to earn a living with a legal job, to choose his own profession and practice it freely. It does not matter that these dismissed judges or prosecutors, with a law degree, have not yet been criminally convicted by any court. It is important that they do not have "ethical integrity" according to the Balla-Manja article. And this rule is set by the amber Rama, do you understand?! But Article 30 of the Criminal Code considers the removal of the right to exercise a profession as a supplementary criminal punishment when convicted of a crime: " For persons who have committed crimes or criminal misdemeanors, together with the main punishment, one or some of these supplementary punishments: 1. Prohibition of the right to exercise public functions.
According to this militant ruralism, a judge USA Phone Number who did not pass the vetting because a relative was sentenced for 0.4 grams of hashish for personal use, cannot become a lawyer. If a judge who was dismissed because she did not justify her property was left by her husband before she met him and married him, she cannot become a lawyer. According to this rule, these people aged 40-60 must either go back to university for another 5 years and study another profession or sell bananas. That Rama considers "ethical integrity" very important. Precisely the one who screamed about removing the mandate of the deputy or the mayor from a person convicted of rape, murder, drug trafficking, prostitution or kidnapping, was a violation of constitutional rights.
This is a serious violation of the constitutional right of Article 49 of the Constitution, which gives every citizen the right to earn a living with a legal job, to choose his own profession and practice it freely. It does not matter that these dismissed judges or prosecutors, with a law degree, have not yet been criminally convicted by any court. It is important that they do not have "ethical integrity" according to the Balla-Manja article. And this rule is set by the amber Rama, do you understand?! But Article 30 of the Criminal Code considers the removal of the right to exercise a profession as a supplementary criminal punishment when convicted of a crime: " For persons who have committed crimes or criminal misdemeanors, together with the main punishment, one or some of these supplementary punishments: 1. Prohibition of the right to exercise public functions.